Girl online and hitch get acquainted

Girl online and hitch get acquainted

Girl online and hitch get acquainted

Ysq questionnaire design

 YSQ Scoring

<Up Level Field: No up level page>

Young Schema Questionnaires:  

Informal Clinical Scoring Instructions

General Comments

The instructions below are written for the YSQ Long Form (Second Edition).  However, the scoring of the Short Form is essentially the same,  except that all schemas on the Short Form have the same number of items (five),  so there is no scoring grid.

Furthermore, one schema, Social Undesirability,  is missing from the Short Form,  because it did not emerge as a separate factor in two different research studies.  Social Undesirability is no longer considered a separate Early Maladaptive Schema, even though it still appears on the Long Form. Social Undesirability is probably a subset of the Defectiveness / Shame schema.

Please note that, on both forms of the YSQ, only 15 of the current 18 Early Maladaptive Schemas are measured.  This is because the listing of 18 schemas has been updated and expanded more recently than the YSQ.  We do not want to alter the YSQ at this time,  because so much research is already ongoing with the current versions. The three schemas that do not appear on the YSQ are:  Approval-Seeking/Recognition-Seeking, Negativity/Pessimism, and Punitiveness.

Matching Items To Schemas

Items on the questionnaire are clustered according to specific schemas.  These clusters of items are separated by an asterisk and a two-letter code that is an abbreviation for the schema.  The abbreviations for the sixteen schemas are listed below.  For example, items 1-9 on the Long Form are followed by the abbreviation ed ,  indicating that these specific items assess the Emotional Deprivation schema.  The schemas are defined in the newest listing of Early Maladaptive Schemas.

ed       Emotional Deprivation               

ab       Abandonment                    

ma       Mistrust/Abuse                    

si           Social Isolation                    

ds        Defectiveness/Shame                    

su       Social Undesirability (no longer a separate schema)                    

fa       Failure                    

di       Dependence/Incompetence          

vh         Vulnerability to Harm & Illness

em      Enmeshment

sb       Subjugation

ss       Self Sacrifice

ei       Emotional Inhibition

us       Unrelenting Standards

et       Entitlement

is       Insufficient Self-Control/Self-Discipline

Representing Scores on the YSQ Long Form Grid

Each schema on the YSQ Long Form has a different number of items to measure it.  We developed the Schema Grid as a way to adjust for the differences in the number of items by converting the "raw scores" for each schema to a percentage of the total number of items for each schema.  When the scores are plotted on the grid, the  grid yields a pictorial profile of each patient's high- and low-scoring schemas.

The order in which schemas are clustered on the questionnaire corresponds to their listing on the Schema Grid.

Scores for each schema are found by counting the total number of items within each schema rated either 5 or 6.  This number is then entered and graphed in the corresponding row on the Schema Grid.  For example, a client who rates one item on the ed cluster with a 5, and two items with 6's, would score 3 on Emotional Deprivation.  

This total score of 3 is entered on the Grid by entering 3 in the box next to Emotional Deprivation, then drawing a dot midway between the 2 and 4 in that row.  After scores for each schema have been entered this way, a line is drawn connecting the dots.  This profile visually presents the relative influence of each of the schemas.

The headings at the top of the Grid convert the total score on any schema into a percentage from 0 to 100%.  The percentage of items rated 5 or 6  can be determined using this conversion chart.  For example, a client scoring 6 on Emotional Deprivation would have endorsed approximately 70% of the items tapping Emotional Deprivation with 5's or 6's.  Percentage scores can be used to directly compare the relative importance of each schema for the client.

Interpreting the Scores

On the Long Form, we generally consider any score of 3 or more on a schema to be meaningful.  On the Short Form, any score of 2 or more is usually meaningful.  After scoring the YSQ,  we explain to the patient which schemas received moderately high scores and which received very high scores.  We then explain what each schema means, in everyday language, and encourage patients to discuss how each schema has been relevant to their life.  We also encourage patients to read the chapters in Reinventing Your Life that are relevant to their schemas.  

If very few schemas, or no schemas, rate high for a particular patient, we usually assume that the patient is a " schema avoider ," and we will not focus on the results of the YSQ with the patient.  Instead, we will rely on other assessment strategies to determine which schemas are probably relevant to the patient.  At some later point, we will deal directly with the avoidant coping style, at which time we will also administer the YRAI.

Girl online and hitch get acquainted

Girl online and hitch get acquainted

Girl online and hitch get acquainted

Related news

Asq se 18 months questionnaires
Dq dairy queen menu
Epistemic modality in political speeches about war
Branding questionnaire sample
Motel no valqueire rj
3 bedroom accommodation seminyak bali real estate
Soeur sourire dominique karaoke songs
Mairie du puy sainte reparade service technique numericable belgique
Kamera depan iphone 4s buramoda